The process will take four steps: Fact Finding, Group Fact Finding, Evidence Selection and Trail Preparation. Each group will use the Internet to gather information. If you select information from a site to use in the case, please note the URL of the site for future reference.Remember this is a court case, and all evidence may be called into question. Everyone in the group should take notes about the information you find.
1. Fact Finding:
Reviewing the basic facts of the Amistad Case. When you visit the Introductory sites you will only be looking for general information about the case. However, when you visit the Digging Deeper Sites, you will begin to gather information specific for the case you want to make.
2. Group Fact Finding:
Will you be ready to argue your case? Will you have enough research necessary to participate in this courtroom? Will you be able to prove your point with the right piece of text, either projected to the class from the Web or in hard copy? What other sources might you use? Select your group from the list below. Go to your group's instructions and complete the specific directions located there.
3. Evidence Selection:
As the trial approaches, you must be sure of your evidence. Because information is found on the Internet, this does not mean it is correct or factual. Like all information we gather, each of you must be ask critical questions regarding all your sources of information.
4. Trial Preparation:
Gather together evidence, consider procedures, and prepare for the actions you wish to use in court.
5. The Trial:
Come to school dressed for you role. Bring important papers and practice your speeches. Take a peak at the trial proceedings the group of Court Officials have made, to make sure you are ready.
6. Evaluation:
The trial is over. You will be asked to reflect upon these prompts.
How well did you act as a trial participant?
Were you adequately prepared?
Did you participate each day of the trial?
Did you remain in your role?
Did you dress and act the part?
What are the issues behind this case?
What were the motivations of the slaveholders?
What were the motivations of the Abolitionists?
What fundamental human right was at trial here?
Why did the court decide the way it did?
